[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Marketing
of breastmilk substitutes
The baby formula industry boasts one of the greatest marketing
successes of all time. A lot of people spend a lot of money for an
inferior substance that, depending on your living conditions, can be
a death sentence for your baby, or, if your lucky enough to have all
the resources you need, it can just mean that your baby will get sick
a lot more often, will suffer from more allergies and a higher risk
of cancer, and will not develop her or his maximum intellectual
potential. All this while the superior substance that provides
optimal growth of body and brain, that
protects the baby from disease and
allergy, that reduces the chances that the
child will be abused, that furthermore protects the mother from
cancer and osteoporosis
is practically for free. Why is it that people spend so much money on
a substance they not only do not need, but may actually harm their
baby?
This page focuses on marketing of breastmilk
substitutes in industrialized countries where income levels are high
enough that most families can afford to buy sufficient formula for
their babies, where most families have access to clean water and heat
so they can feed their baby sterile formula, where there is
reasonable access to health care so the increased risk of infection
that a bottle-fed baby is not necessarily a death sentence.
You'll see that formula marketing in
industrialized countries is truly appalling. But it is much worse in
the third world, where WHO and UNICEF estimate that one to one and a
half million babies die every year because they were not breastfed.
See the relevant page for more information on this.
- Through years of advertising and close relations with the
medical profession, the baby formula industry has created a
bottle-feeding culture. The Western
attitude towards the female breast as an
exclusively sexual object has also contributed to this
- Most people believe that bottle-feeding is just as good as
breastfeeding, if not better; this view is promoted not just by
advertisement, but also (still) by the medical profession, and
even by authors of some books and videos that supposedly encourage
mothers to breastfeed their babies. The truth is of course very
different. What is amazing is that people who raise cattle or dogs
or other animals know very well that there is no adequate
substitute for mother's milk. Somehow, the baby food industry has
duped us into believing that the same is not true for human
babies.
- The bottle-feeding culture we live
in makes a woman who breastfeeds her baby
in public feel awkward. Bottle-feeding is accepted by
everyone, but breastfeeding is considered shameful.
- Here are some specific examples of advertising tricks used by
the baby formula industry:
- Many manufacturers supply pediatricians and hospitals with
free samples of their products, which are then given to new
mothers. A mother who receives a free formula sample from her
hospital or doctor thinks that the hospital or doctor endorses
the product.
- Baby formula companies produce books and videos that
allegedly provide information on breastfeeding. Those books and
videos are often bundled with formula samples or discount
coupons. They often contain a lot of advertisements for the
company's product as well. Furthermore, many of these books and
videos show exhausted, half-naked women breastfeeding a baby in
a dark room, all alone. Formula ads in the same book or video
show a well-dressed, smiling woman bottle-feeding a chubby baby
in pleasant surroundings.
- When the international code of formula marketing was
adopted, formula companies came up with an amazing gimmick. The
code prohibits pictures of babies (or other images idealizing
bottle-feeding) on containers of breastmilk substitutes. Soon
after the code was adopted, formula companies invented a new
product called a "follow-up formula". That product is supposed
to be given to babies who have been weaned. As such, the
formula companies argue, this product is not a breastmilk
substitute, and is therefore immune from the Code. They put
pictures of babies on containers for this product, which of
course has the same name as their regular formula. What's more,
they encourage early weaning by
advertising this product for babies of a ridiculously young age
(three months is common). What's more, many companies market
so-called weaning cereals, and recommend these for babies that
are too young to be weaned from the breast.
So much for marketing strategies. No one can deny that most people
believe that bottle-feeding is just as good as breastfeeding, or at
least nearly as good. By now, it is clear that breastmilk
is superior to artificial baby milks in just about any imaginable
way, and its mode of delivery is also conducive to better parenting.
However, people who produce breastmilk (that is, women) have no power
to relentlessly promote it the way formula companies promote their
inferior substitute.
Back to: the breastfeeding
page
home
| breastfeeding
[an error occurred while processing this directive]